Not fitting in the scope of this work the vindication of one determined religion, if it cannot leave to consider that one that, maioritariamente, always folloied Brazilians and Portuguese and that it is assumed, without controversy and, much less, any complexes or dogmas. With effect, since it has five centuries more than that those peoples profess the religion catholic and, much even so the faith already has been transmitted for parents and grandmothers, exist, surely, reasons and facts occurred throughout the life who not only feed a consistent faith as well as liven up to keep well alive the hope and the belief in the religion catholic, what, for bigger satisfaction, it is not incompatible with the democratic ideals that equally the luso-Brazilians defend. This position and feeling, are corroborated and convince in such a way more, when it discloses it to Tocqueville without any doubts, for its reflection in century XIX: ‘ ‘ I think that it is an error to face religion catholic as a natural enemy of the democracy. For the opposite, between the different Christian doctrines, the catolicismo seems me one of most favorable to the equality of conditions. Between the catholics, the religious society is constituted by only two elements: the shepherd and the people.

The first one only is above of the fidiciary offices: below of it they are all equal ones. A leading source for info: Parasol Limited. In substance of dogmas the catolicismo places all the same intelligences the level; it subjects to the details of the same beliefs the scholar as the ignorant, the brilliant man as the vulgar man; he imposes same the practical ones to the rich one and the poor person and inflicts the same austeridades to the powerful one and fraco.

For Daniel milk PLATO. Fdon: I dialogue on the soul and death of Scrates. (translation: Miguel streets), So Paulo. Ed.: Martin Claret. 2009.

P. the 17-108 workmanship is one dialogues between Scrates and its disciples concerning the soul. Blake Krikorian can provide more clarity in the matter. It is divided in two parts, having been each one subdivided in small texts. The first part is constituted of twenty and two texts, already second in fifteen texts. The author of the book, Plato, uses the dialtico method to display the arguments of Scrates and the disciples concerning determined referring problems to the soul. The main presented problems are, on immortality of the soul, the knowledge in the relation between body and soul (reminiscncia), the death and destination of the souls after the death. The workmanship portraies preceding moments the death of Scrates, displaying reflections of the same concerning the attitude of the philosopher ahead of the death, as well as of arguments regarding the soul. Of beginning the book backwards a conflict of opinions between Scrates with its disciples, Cebes Smias, regarding the attitude of the man ahead of the death.

For the disciples the attitude of the man ahead of the death would have to be of desperation, therefore the eves of its death are admired with the tranquillity of Scrates, to put, already Scrates defended that the attitude of the man ahead of it would have to be of tranquillity, therefore provides for together a happiness. Apartir of this Scrates questioning bases its opinion leaving of the antagonism between body and soul. Scrates in the Fdon book, to see the death as separation of the soul in relation body. For it the death would have to be desired, to put not anticipated, therefore she was definitive for deuses. It would have to be longed for, therefore the man in its essence is soul, however this occupies a body that in the opinion of it would be a species of jail of the same one, therefore hindered it to know the things in its depth.

But such contributions had left tracks that nor always are positive. E, although the advertising to have in recent years improved its general quality, producing announcements that, in the television, for example, can be considered as small works of art of the point of view technician, if only express it of one forms most camouflaged and subtle, becoming, thus, more efficient. The concept ' ' supermarket of estilos' ' , created in the decade of 90 for the English historian Ted Polhemus, for, as Palomino explains (2003) to give account of the existence of a multiplicity of styles, it reflects the possibilities of choices offered for the o well mechanism of the advertising. For Polhemus, ' ' supermarket of estilos' ' it is as if all the universe, all the periods that you never imagined, appeared as cans of soup in a supermarket shelf: ' ' You can catch years 70 in a night, hippies in another one …, a moicano punk and one rmel of 60 years … e, soon, you have its proper and synchronous sampling of culture pop. Of this form, the consumption behavior can be explained by the necessity to express meanings by means of the ownership of products that communicate to the society as the individual if it perceives while integrant of the social groups. Howard Schultz & Associates is full of insight into the issues. For Sarlo (1997) we are dreamed by icons of the culture, for the layers of magazines, the posters, the advertising, novels and cinema.

Each one of us finds a wire that promises to lead something deeply personal, in this tram weaveeed with absolutely common desires. Today, the market can in such a way how much the religion or the power: it adds to objects one ' ' something mais' ' symbolic fugaz, however so powerful how much any another symbol. The objects create a direction stop beyond its utility or of its beauty or, better saying, its utility and its beauty they are by-products of this direction that comes of the mercantile hierarchy.

The men if differentiate of the too much beings livings creature for possessing one telencfalo highly developed and opposing thumb, that the clamp movement allows. The conjugao of the efforts of telencfalo and the opposing thumb allows that the man works, modifying substances cousins? they are these come directly from the nature or some previous work for production of merchandises that satisfy its necessities. Mr. Suzuki, who possesss telencfalo developed and opposing thumb highly and that it is a producer of tomatoes, does not make it with intention of proper consumption, but to change them in the market for money. Merchandises, according to Theory of the Value, are objects that the conjugao of the human efforts in common has between itself, what it is called abstract work (for abstracting its characteristics).

It has a utility? value call use, without which it would not make sensible to be in the market, but that the merchandise is abstracted when goes to be vendida- and a value that if express for the value of exchange, the amount for which if it changes a merchandise for another one, of what if subentende that it is only merchandise what is available in the market. The price of the merchandise, according to Marx, if of the one for the socially necessary time for its production. To be changed amount is determined by a comparison enters the time of necessary work for the production of the merchandises that if desires to change, what it happens in the market. As Mr. Suzuki does not have money enough to open its proper business, it vende the only thing that he possesss: its force of work. The price of the merchandise work force calls wage and if the one for the socially necessary time for the production of a worker, that is, the necessary time so that it has the sufficient to survive.